User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; XOOM 2 ME Build/7.7.1-128_MZ607-12) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaXOOM 2 ME Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.0MotorolaXoom 2 Media Edition 3GTabletyesyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.0MotorolaXOOM 2 MEtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.0.4MotorolaXOOM 2 MEcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.21602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4MotorolaMotorola Xoomcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.0.4MotorolaXOOM 2tabletyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.0MotorolaXOOM 2 METabletyesyescloseclose0.06601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:18 | by ThaDafinser