User agent detail

MOT-AF/4.1.8 UP/4.1.16s
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaAF Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaAFMobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-AF 4.1.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.16sclose MotorolaTi260mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaAFsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaAFcloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 MotorolaAFmobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaTi260Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:18 | by ThaDafinser