User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Maemo; Linux armv7l; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120723 Firefox/14.0.1 Fennec/14.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
Firefox Mobile Fennec 14.0Maemo Gecko 14.0mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Fennec 14.0Gecko 14.0Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 14.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Firefox 14.0closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with Fennecmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fennec 14.0Gecko Maemo yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 14.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 14.0closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fennec 14.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Fennec 14.0Gecko 20120723Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile Fennec 14.0Gecko 14.0Maemo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 14.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 17.0closeMaemo NokiaGeneric Maemo with FennecFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:17 | by ThaDafinser