User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; OpenBSD i386; xx; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110216 Firefox/3.5.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Firefox 3.5.16OpenBSD Gecko 1.9.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1OpenBSD Desktop0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5.16closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.24102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko OpenBSD desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5.16closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.5.16closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.5.16closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.13601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5.16Gecko 20110216OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.5.16Gecko 1.9.1OpenBSD desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5.16closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5.6closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:17 | by ThaDafinser