User agent detail

NokiaC5002/3.00(0)ActiveSync 3gpp-gba
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaC5002 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NokiaC5002 3.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close NokiaC5002mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian NokiaC5002smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 3.00(0)ActivecloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close NokiaC5002closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia C5002closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NokiaC5002mobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:17 | by ThaDafinser