User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; U; Linux 7631; en) AppleWebKit/531.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/531.2 LG Browser/4.1.4( NO_NUM; LGE; Media/SP520; ST.3.97.409.F; 0x00000001;); LG NetCast.Media-2011
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
LG Browser 4.1 Webkit 531.2LGSP520 NetCast Media 2011television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 531.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux LGNetCasttv0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux LGSP520closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.12201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 531.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser 4.1Webkit 531.2 LGSP520 NetCast Media 2011televisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:16 | by ThaDafinser