User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible MSIE 6.0 Windows CE IEMobile 7.11) ASUS-GalaxyMini/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AsusGalaxyMini Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.11closeWindows AsusGalaxyMinimobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.11Trident Windows CE AsusGalaxyMinismartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.11closeWindows CE AsusGalaxyMinicloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44605 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.1AsusGalaxy Minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile AsusGalaxyMiniFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:16 | by ThaDafinser