User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ME302KL Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Chrome 38.0Android 4.2unknown AsusMeMO Pad FHD 10Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.2AsusMeMO Pad FHD 10Tabletyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.2AsusMeMO Pad FHD 10 LTEtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.2.2AsusME302KLcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.2.2AsusMemoPad FHD 10tabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.2AsusME302KLTabletyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:14 | by ThaDafinser