User agent detail

iBrowser/26 Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; xx; LG-LU6200 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-ibrowser.yaml
iBrowser 2.6Android 4.1.2Webkit 534.30LGOptimus LTEmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2LGLU6200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IBrowse WebKit Android 4.1LGLU6200smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2LGLU6200closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.12401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iBrowser 26WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.2LGLGLU6200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iBrowser 2.6Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.2LGOptimus LTEmobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1LGLU6200Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:13 | by ThaDafinser