User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Tizen 3.0 IVI; sdk) AppleWebKit/537.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/537.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Tizen 3.0Webkit 537.3emulator Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 3.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 3.0WebKit Tizen 3.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 3.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.02 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 3.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.3Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.3Tizen 3.0emulatorcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android close TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:13 | by ThaDafinser