User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Jolicloud Linux i686; xx) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Joli OS/1.2 Chromium/10.0.648.82 Chrome/10.0.648.82 Safari/534.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-joli.yaml
Chromium 10.0.648.82Joli OS 1.2Webkit 534.16desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 10.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.07201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 10.0.648.82closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 10.0.648.82closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 10.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 10.0.648.82closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 10.0.648closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 10.0.648.82closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.12301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 10.0.648.82WebKit 534.16Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 10.0.648.82Webkit 534.16Joli OS 1.2desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 10.0.648.82closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:12 | by ThaDafinser