User agent detail

GetJarSDK/20120529.03 com.fgol.sharkfree3/13 android/2.3.5 (o2_uk; htc_saga; HTC Desire S)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCsaga Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
GetJarSDK 20120529.03closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCsagamobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCsagasmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCsagacloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTC Desire Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCsagamobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:12 | by ThaDafinser