User agent detail

MOZILLA41 (COMPATIBLE MSIE 50 SYMBIAN OS NOKIA 7650424) OPERA 610 IT
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia7650424 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 610closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 610closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 610Blink Symbian OS Nokia7650424smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 610closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Nokia7650424closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 610closeSYMBIAN OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 610 Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 50 Nokia7650424mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:12 | by ThaDafinser