User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.1; en-gb; HD2_T8585 Build/FRF91) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCHD2 T8585 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.1GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.1closeAndroid 2.2.1HTCHD2 T8585closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533.1Windows Mobile 2.2.1HTCHD2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:10 | by ThaDafinser