User agent detail

5acd734a-1ed3-4a17-ad9d-0b09ae7bc2d2/Nutch-1.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNutchBot/Crawler0.057 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
5acd734a-1ed3-4a17-ad9d-0b09ae7bc2d2 Nutchcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesApache Nutchclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesNutch-based Botcrawler0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNutchclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesApache Nutchclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:10 | by ThaDafinser