User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Tizen; Opera Mini/7.6.9/36.2534; U; en) Presto/2.12.423 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-687.php
Opera Mini 7.6Tizen unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 7.6Presto 2.2Tizen Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 7.6.9close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.6Presto Tizen yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.6.9close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.6.9close closeclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.6.9close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 7.6.9Presto 2.12.423 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 7.6.9Presto 2.12.423Tizen mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 7.1close OperaMini 7Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:10 | by ThaDafinser