User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Vodafone/1.0/LG-GS290/V10c Browser/Obigo-Q7.3 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) UNTRUSTED/1.0 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; Mozilla) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.0.342 U2/1.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Obigo Q 7.3 Gecko LGGS290 Cookie Freshmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.20602 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 LGGS290smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.0close LGGS290closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGGS290closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.3Gecko LGGS290 Cookie Freshmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile LG-GS290closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:09 | by ThaDafinser