User agent detail

LG-G5310/JM AU/4.10 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGG5310 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
AU 4.1 Brew 2.0LGG5310Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-G5310 JMcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGG5310mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGG5310smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGG5310closeclosecloseclose0.021 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGG5310closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGG5310mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGG5310Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:09 | by ThaDafinser