User agent detail

Nokia3711fold/5.0 (03.80) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia3711fold Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia3711foldsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia3711foldcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.16002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 3711foldcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420 Nokia3711foldmobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia3711Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:09 | by ThaDafinser