User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1709.117 Amigo/32.0.1709.117 MRCHROME SOC Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Amigo 32.0WinVista 6.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Amigo 32.0Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.07601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1709.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1709.117closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Amigo 32.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1709.117closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mail.ru Chromium Browser 32.0.1709closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 32.0.1709.117closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1709.117WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 32.0.1709.117Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1709.117closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 32.0.1700.7closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.06401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:09 | by ThaDafinser