User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1 JELLY BEAN; it-it; Glory Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Android Browser Android 4.1.1WebKit BrondiGLORYsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1BrondiGLORYsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1 JELLY BEANclosecloseclosecloseclose0.09601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.1BrondiGLORYmobile:smartyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1BrondiGlorySmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:08 | by ThaDafinser