User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen 1.0; xx) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Tizen Browser/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Samsung Browser 1.0Tizen 1.0Webkit 534.46mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.46closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Tizen Browser 1.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Tizen Browser 1.0WebKit Tizen 1.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Tizen Browser 1.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 534.46Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Browser 1.0Webkit 534.46Tizen 1.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android close TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:08 | by ThaDafinser