User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.1; en-us; NOOK BNRV200 Build/ERD79 1.4.3) Apple WebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Android Browser Android 2.2.1WebKit Barnes & NobleNook BNRV200tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Version 4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2Barnes & NobleNook BNRV200tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.1closeAndroid 2.2.1NookBNRV200closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.21102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.1Nook eReader Colorcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose2.43224 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.1Barnes & NobleNOOK Colorereaderyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.2closeAndroid 2.2LogicPDZoom2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.08501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:08 | by ThaDafinser