User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/1.1.5005/hifi/tmobile/at; Nokia 5300; de; U; ssr)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Mini 1.1Series40 Nokia5300 XpressMusicmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 1.1Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 1.1.5005closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 1.1Presto Symbian Nokia5300smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 1.1.5005closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 1.1.5005close Nokia5300closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 1.1.5005close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 1.1.5005 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 1.1 Series40 Nokia5300 XpressMusicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:07 | by ThaDafinser