User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0_(SymbianOS/9.4;_U;_Series60/5.0_Samsung/I8910;_Profile/MIDP-2.1_Configuration/CLDC-1.1_)_AppleWebKit/525_(KHTML,_like_Gecko)_Version/3.0_Safari/525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungI8910 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Symbian OS 9.4yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0_Safariclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4SamsungI8910closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 525Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 525Series60 5.0SamsungOmnia HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:07 | by ThaDafinser