User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; Surfer 7.34 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.48 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.1unknown ExplaySurfer 7.34 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.1ExplaySurfer 7.34 3GTabletyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.48closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.48closeAndroid 4.1.2Explay7.34mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.1smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.48closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.1.2Surfer 7.34closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Surf closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.48WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.1.2ExplaySurfer 7.34tabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.48closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.1Explay7.34Tabletyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:06 | by ThaDafinser