User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; vi; F15 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.6.0.378 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 9.6.0.378Android 4.2.2WebKit PULIDF15smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.6U3 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.36604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.6WebKit Android 4.2PULIDF15smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.6.0closeAndroid 4.2.2F15closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.6.0.378WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.6Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2PULIDF15mobile:smartyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:06 | by ThaDafinser