User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows Phone OS 7.0; Trident/3.1; IEMobile/7.0) LG;LG-E900
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGE900 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.0Trident 3.1WinPhone7 7.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows 7.0LGE900mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.0Trident Windows Phone 7.0LGE900smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0LGE900closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone LGLGE900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45705 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone 7.0LGOptimus 7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0LGE900Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:05 | by ThaDafinser