User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; nokiae5-00) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.0.311 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0 3gpp-gba
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.2Series60 Gecko NokiaE5-00mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 Symbian Nokiae5-00smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.311 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Series60 NokiaE5-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:05 | by ThaDafinser