User agent detail

NCUA [pkgName=com.tmobile.highlight, pkgVer=3.1.87369.21, osVer=16, mfg=LGE, model=LG-P769, prod=u2_tmo_us]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGP769 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NCUA closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGP769,mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGEsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGP769closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLG Optimus L9 P769closeclosecloseclosecloseclose2.09821 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGP769,mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:05 | by ThaDafinser