User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; en-us ; MITO T100 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.6.1.262/145/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MitoT100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 2.3yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.1closeAndroid 2.3.6MitoT100closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.1.262WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.6Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6HargaMITO T100tabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:05 | by ThaDafinser