User agent detail

Lenovo A789/S210 Linux/3.0.13 Android/4.0 Release/05.11.2012 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 Profile/ Configuration/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Android 4.0Android 4.0unknown LenovoA789Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0LenovoA789Mobile Phoneyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Lenovo closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0LenovoA789mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0LenovoA789smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.0LenovoA789closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 4.0LenovoA789mobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.0closeAndroid 4.0LenovoA789Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:05 | by ThaDafinser