User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; IM-A870L Build/IRON AIO VERSION 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.82 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechIM-A870L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.1PantechVega IronMobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.1.2PantechIM-A870Lmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iron WebKit Android 4.1PantechIM-A870Lsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.1.2PantechIM-A870Lcloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iron closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SRWare Iron WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.1.2PantechVega Ironmobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.1PantechIM-A870LSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.21902 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:05 | by ThaDafinser