User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 5.1) Opera 12.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 12.14Windows XP desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.14Presto 2.12WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.14closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.14Presto Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.14closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.14closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.14closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.28503 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.14 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.14 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.05701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:03 | by ThaDafinser