User agent detail

QQBrowser (Linux; U; zh-cn; HTC Hero Build/FRF91)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCHero Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
QQBrowser closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2HTCHeromobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux HTCHerosmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser closeLinux HTCHerocloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser Linux HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.2HTCHeromobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:02 | by ThaDafinser