User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (U; Mobile; iPhone; Smartphone; xx; 320x240) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) WM5 Iris/1.1.7 Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5A345 Safari/525.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-iris.yaml
Iris 1.1.7Windows Mobile 5.0Webkit 525.18.1mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.08601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 3.1.1closeiOS AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 3.1WebKit iOS AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.1.1close closeiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iris 1.1.7close AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 1.1.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iris Browser 1.1.7WebKit 525.18.1Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iris 1.1.7Webkit 525.18.1Windows Mobile 5.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.1closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:02 | by ThaDafinser