User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8.2; Mac App Store Edition) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 12.11OS X Mountain Lion 10.8Presto 2.12.388desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.11closeOS X 10.8.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.11Presto Mac 10.8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.11closeOS X 10.8.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.11closeMac OS X 10.8.2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.11closeOS X 10.8.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12.388Mac OS X 10.8.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12.388OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.07501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:01 | by ThaDafinser