User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; QQBrowser/7.6.21433.400)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
QQ Browser 7.6.21433 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 10.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 7.6Trident Windows 8desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser 7.6.21433closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 7.6.21433.400Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 7.6Trident 6.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:01 | by ThaDafinser