User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (S60V3; U; Pt-br; NOKIAE5-00)/UC Browser8.2.0.132/28/351/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE5-00 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Symbian OS Series 60 V3NokiaE5-00smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser UCcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeSymbian OS NokiaE5-00closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.14602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.132 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Series60 3NokiaE5-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:01 | by ThaDafinser