User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; Opera Software; videowebtv; ; ; ); en) Presto/2.10.287 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 12.00GNU/Linux Presto VideowebVideoWeb TVtv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.00closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.00Presto GNU/Linux VideowebVideoWeb TVtv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
WebTV 2.10.287closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux Opera Softwarevideowebtvcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeWebTV closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebTV Presto 2.10.287Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Presto 2.10.287 televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:00 | by ThaDafinser