User agent detail

MOT-MOTORAZRmaxxV3/96.80.51R BER2.2 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; 11073071) Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera 8.00 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaMOTORAZRmaxxV3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.00close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.00Presto MotorolaMOTORAZRmaxxV3smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.0close MotorolaMOTORAZRmaxxV3closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.0 DROID RAZRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini MotorolaMOTORAZRmaxxV3mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaRAZR V8Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:00 | by ThaDafinser