User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 4.0; xx) Opera 8.51
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 8.51Windows NT 4.0 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 8.51Presto 1.0WinNT 4.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.51closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.51Presto Windows NTdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.51closeWindows NT 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.51closeWindows NT 4.0 closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.51closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.51 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 8.51 Windows NT 4.0desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 8.52closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:00 | by ThaDafinser