User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ME173X Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.59 Safari/537.36 OPR/26.0.1656.87080
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Opera Mobile 26.0Android 4.2unknown AsusMemo Pad HD7Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 26.0Blink Android 4.2AsusMemo Pad HD7Tabletyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 26.0.1656.87080closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 26.0.1656.87080closeAndroid 4.2.2AsusME173Xmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 26.0Blink Android 4.2AsusMeMO Pad HD 7tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 26.0.1656.87080closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 26.0.1656closeAndroid 4.2.2AsusME173Xcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 26.0.1656.87080WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 26.0Blink Android 4.2.2AsusMemoPad HD 7tabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 26.0.1656.87080closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 26closeAndroid 4.2AsusME173XTabletyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:00 | by ThaDafinser