User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; tr-tr; MOMO20S Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/537.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Android 4.0Android 4.2unknown PloyerMomo20sTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2PloyerMomo20sTabletyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.63606 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2PloyerMOMO20Scloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 537.16Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 537.16Android 4.2.2MOMO20Stabletyescloseclose0.08101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:58 | by ThaDafinser