User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; en-us; MITO T330 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) FlyFlow/1.0 Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MitoT330 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
FlyFlow WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.13901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Baidu Explorer 1.0closeAndroid 4.1.2MitoT330closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.15602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 1.0Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.2HargaMITO T330tabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:58 | by ThaDafinser