User agent detail

Safari5530.17 CFNetwork/438.12 Darwin/9.7.0 (i386) (Macmini2,1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Mac OS X 10.5.7 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari5530 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeOS X 10.5.7desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.5desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 438.12closeMac OS X 10.5.7AppleMacmini2,1closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Mac OS X 10.5.7desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:58 | by ThaDafinser