User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV; TVwithVideoPlayer) NetFront/4.1 AQUOSBrowser/1.0 InettvBrowser/2.2 (08001F;DTV06VSFC;0009;0001)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sharp.yaml
NetFront 4.1 SharpAquos TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.1NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.05401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.1close GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.1NetFront SharpAquos Net Plustv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 4.1close DTV06VSFCcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 4.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.11401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.1 SharpAquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:57 | by ThaDafinser