User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_6; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Fluid/0.9.6 Safari/528.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Fluid 0.9.6Mac 10.5.6WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.15802 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 528.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Fluid 0.9.6closeOS X 10.5.6desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fluid 0.9WebKit Mac 10.5desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X 10.5.6closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Fluid 0.9.6closeMac OS X 10.5.6closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fluid 0.9.6closeOS X 10.5.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.14001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 528.16Mac OS X 10.5.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 528.16Mac OS X 10.5desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:57 | by ThaDafinser