User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.74 Safari/537.36 MRCHROME
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Amigo 28.0.1500.74Windows 7Blink desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.16802 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.74closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.74closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Amigo 28.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.74closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mail.ru Chromium Browser 28.0.1500closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.74closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.74WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 28Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.74closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 28.0.1500.95closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:57 | by ThaDafinser