User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 Firebird/0.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firebird 0.7Windows 95Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.5Gecko 1.5Win95 95Windows DesktopDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firebird (old name for Firefox) 0.7closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firebird 0.7Gecko Windows 95desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firebird 0.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firebird 0.7closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firebird 0.7Gecko 20031007Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firebird 0.7Gecko 1.5Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:57 | by ThaDafinser